[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080804214627.GA8840@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:46:27 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Rodrigo Rubira Branco <rbranco@...checkpoint.com>,
Jake Edge <jake@....net>, Eugene Teo <eteo@...hat.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 01/25] ftrace: remove unneeded documentation
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 05:42:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > 2.6.26-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>
> Well, I object to this patch, but I'm sure I'll be ignored.
Why? There is no ftrace code in the 2.6.26 kernel, so why would we
worry about keeping such documentation up to date, let alone even
present at all?
Why should this matter?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists