[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080804.150249.71509974.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tony.luck@...el.com
Cc: nacc@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BISECTION RESULT] sched: revert cpu_clock to
pre-27ec4407790d075c325e1f4da0a19c56953cce23 state
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:00:47 -0700
> > I'd bet resonable sums of money that we are (once again) accessing
> > per-cpu variables in code before ia64 has a chance to initialize
> > things so that they can actually work. :-(
>
> I tried this simple hack to check ... per-cpu variables are
> not usable until cpu_init() sets up the "ar.k3" register on
> ia64. So this hack checks to see if it is set before calling
> cpu_clock():
Can you guys on IA64 possibly set ar.k3 simply to zero or to some
other similar value which cancels out the per-cpu computation?
That's what sparc64 and other platforms do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists