[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200808050010.45615.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:10:44 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: arekm@...en.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: ip/23212/0x00000102
On Monday, 4 of August 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@...en.pl>
> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:45:10 +0200
>
> >
> > git kernel, pulled around Sat Aug 2 13:32:05 CEST,
> > i686, thinkpad z60m notebook
>
> Obviously the tg3 PCI power-management changes were totally untested.
If you mean the commit below, actually they were tested.
I run this code on a regular basis on my production box and I have never seen
this stack trace. How exactly can I make it appear?
> And unfortunately this is usually par for the course for driver
> changes of this kind that I end up applying directly from Andrew's
> patch bombs. :-/
Sorry for causing the trouble, but had I seen the stack trace, I obviously
wouldn't have posted the patch.
> commit 12dac0756d357325b107fe6ec24921ec38661839
> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> Date: Wed Jul 30 16:37:33 2008 -0700
>
> tg3: adapt tg3 to use reworked PCI PM code
>
> Adapt the tg3 driver to use the reworked PCI PM and make it use the
> exported PCI PM core functions instead of accessing the PCI PM registers
> directly by itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tg3.c b/drivers/net/tg3.c
> index 633c128..26aa37a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tg3.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tg3.c
> @@ -1982,8 +1982,6 @@ static void tg3_power_down_phy(struct tg3 *tp)
> static int tg3_set_power_state(struct tg3 *tp, pci_power_t state)
> {
> u32 misc_host_ctrl;
> - u16 power_control, power_caps;
> - int pm = tp->pm_cap;
>
> /* Make sure register accesses (indirect or otherwise)
> * will function correctly.
> @@ -1992,18 +1990,10 @@ static int tg3_set_power_state(struct tg3 *tp, pci_power_t state)
> TG3PCI_MISC_HOST_CTRL,
> tp->misc_host_ctrl);
>
> - pci_read_config_word(tp->pdev,
> - pm + PCI_PM_CTRL,
> - &power_control);
> - power_control |= PCI_PM_CTRL_PME_STATUS;
> - power_control &= ~(PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK);
> switch (state) {
> case PCI_D0:
> - power_control |= 0;
> - pci_write_config_word(tp->pdev,
> - pm + PCI_PM_CTRL,
> - power_control);
> - udelay(100); /* Delay after power state change */
> + pci_enable_wake(tp->pdev, state, false);
> + pci_set_power_state(tp->pdev, PCI_D0);
Still, I don't think drivers should access the standard PCI PM registers
directly, so perhaps there should be a version of pci_set_power_state()
using udelay() instead of msleep() or we can just replace the msleep()
in pci_set_power_state() with udelay()?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists