linux-kernel - Re: [patch 01/25] ftrace: remove unneeded documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0808041810450.5205@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:16:39 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Rodrigo Rubira Branco <rbranco@...checkpoint.com>,
	Jake Edge <jake@....net>, Eugene Teo <eteo@...hat.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 01/25] ftrace: remove unneeded documentation


On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Greg KH wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 05:42:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > > 2.6.26-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> > 
> > Well, I object to this patch, but I'm sure I'll be ignored.
> 
> Why?  There is no ftrace code in the 2.6.26 kernel, so why would we
> worry about keeping such documentation up to date, let alone even
> present at all?
> 
> Why should this matter?

Greg,

Don't get me wrong. I agree with the reason to pull it. It is the right 
thing to do. But still, I don't like it, not because I disagree with it, 
but simply, I liked the fact that the document made it in before the code.

I just sold my 1994 Nissan Sentra because I seldom drove it. It was the 
right thing to do. But I still don't like the fact that I don't have it 
anymore.

I don't like it. This is a feeling. Nothing to do with being technical. 
Hence, I will not argue it.  I just want it on record that I do not 
_like_ it. ;-)

My objection was only symbolic.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/