[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080804152532.9367abff.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:25:32 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwilder@...ibm.com,
hch@...radead.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/2] Renaming 'trace' to 'relay' and enhancements to
'relay'
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:34:39 +0530
"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Please find the patches that enhance the 'trace' infrastructure
> (available in the -mm tree) and which introduce two new APIs
> relay_dump() and relay_printk().
>
> These patches were submitted earlier as enhancements to trace, but were
> renamed and merged with 'relay' based on your suggestion
> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/28/207).
>
> The patches apply on 2.6.27-rc1-mm1 and have been tested on an x86
> machine. Kindly accept them.
>
I'm a bit perplexed by these trace patches
(http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/trace-code-and-documentation.patch).
Is it useful? Will it be useful? Has anyone expressed
interest/intent to use it, etc? I haven't heard much noise about it
and I'm struggling to justify merging it.
Also, it's starting to look somewhat similar to ftrace, which also
provides sort of high-bandwidth per-cpu channels into userspace for
tracing purposes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists