[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1217889426.7819.26.camel@californication>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:37:06 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04
Hi John,
> > > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
> > > > > list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
> > > > > list.h: add list_cut_position()
> > > >
> > > > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it
> > > > in the commit message.
> > >
> > > Hmmm...no. I thought the original patches had been copied to
> > > linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case.
> > >
> > > The original patches are archived here:
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2
> > >
> > > What problems do you see with them?
> >
> > I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be
> > reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not
> > be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs.
>
> Yes, fine. That wasn't my intent. :-) The patches were originally
> posted about two weeks ago, too bad that didn't actually go to
> linux-kernel. :-(
just post them to LKML (or let Luis do it) so they get reviewed. I
really don't see an issue with them, but that is only me.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists