linux-kernel - Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd18b0c30808041638qcc67ab8xe5247fa8a1bbd36e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:38:52 -0700
From:	"Justin Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
Cc:	"Marcel Holtmann" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org> wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>>> > > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
>>> > > > >       list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
>>> > > > >       list.h: add list_cut_position()
>>> > > >
>>> > > > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it
>>> > > > in the commit message.
>>> > >
>>> > > Hmmm...no.  I thought the original patches had been copied to
>>> > > linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case.
>>> > >
>>> > > The original patches are archived here:
>>> > >
>>> > >   http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2
>>> > >
>>> > >   http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2
>>> > >
>>> > > What problems do you see with them?
>>> >
>>> > I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be
>>> > reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not
>>> > be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs.
>>>
>>> Yes, fine.  That wasn't my intent. :-)  The patches were originally
>>> posted about two weeks ago, too bad that didn't actually go to
>>> linux-kernel. :-(
>>
>> just post them to LKML (or let Luis do it) so they get reviewed. I
>> really don't see an issue with them, but that is only me.
>
> I'll repost those specific patches and add lkml.
>
>  Luis
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

I must be honest, I am really excited
to see ath9k, finally an in kernel module
for my wireless card.

regards;

-- 
Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/