linux-kernel - Re: [patch] PCI: check the return value of device_create_bin_file() in pci_create

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1217932416.7758.4.camel@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:33:36 +1000
From:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] PCI: check the return value of
	device_create_bin_file() in pci_create_bus()

On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 20:16 +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
> Check the return value of device_create_bin_file in pci_create_bus,
> unwind if neccessary, and propogate any errors to the caller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>

Hi Horms,

Fixing these kinds of warnings is highly useful but thankless work, so I
hate to nit pick ..

> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/probe.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/probe.c	2008-08-05 19:58:43.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/probe.c	2008-08-05 19:59:15.000000000 +1000
> @@ -53,26 +53,37 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(no_pci_devices);
>   * a per-bus basis.  This routine creates the files and ties them into
>   * their associated read, write and mmap files from pci-sysfs.c
>   */
> -static void pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
> +static int pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
>  {
> +	int error;
> +
>  	b->legacy_io = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bin_attribute) * 2,
>  			       GFP_ATOMIC);
> -	if (b->legacy_io) {
> -		b->legacy_io->attr.name = "legacy_io";
> -		b->legacy_io->size = 0xffff;
> -		b->legacy_io->attr.mode = S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR;
> -		b->legacy_io->read = pci_read_legacy_io;
> -		b->legacy_io->write = pci_write_legacy_io;
> -		device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_io);
> -
> -		/* Allocated above after the legacy_io struct */
> -		b->legacy_mem = b->legacy_io + 1;
> -		b->legacy_mem->attr.name = "legacy_mem";
> -		b->legacy_mem->size = 1024*1024;
> -		b->legacy_mem->attr.mode = S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR;
> -		b->legacy_mem->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_mem;
> -		device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_mem);
> +	if (!b->legacy_io)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	b->legacy_io->attr.name = "legacy_io";
> +	b->legacy_io->size = 0xffff;
> +	b->legacy_io->attr.mode = S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR;
> +	b->legacy_io->read = pci_read_legacy_io;
> +	b->legacy_io->write = pci_write_legacy_io;
> +	error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_io);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;

Should we kfree(b->legacy_io) here?

> +
> +	/* Allocated above after the legacy_io struct */
> +	b->legacy_mem = b->legacy_io + 1;
> +	b->legacy_mem->attr.name = "legacy_mem";
> +	b->legacy_mem->size = 1024*1024;
> +	b->legacy_mem->attr.mode = S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR;
> +	b->legacy_mem->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_mem;
> +	error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_mem);
> +	if (error) {
> +		device_remove_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_io);
> +		return error;

And here?

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)