lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adak5evsm9s.fsf@cisco.com>
Date:	Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:02:07 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeremy@...p.org,
	hugh@...itas.com, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workaround minor lockdep bug triggered by mm_take_all_locks

 > Let's focus on check_deadlock->print_deadlock_bug and somebody who's
 > not beyond the point please explain what print_deadlock_bug reports
 > that does not actually occur and why it's a good idea to change the
 > common code to accommodate for its false positives instead of getting
 > rid of it for good.

check_deadlock operates on classes of locks, so it can warn about
potential deadlocks, eg if we have

	foo(obj1, obj2)
	{
		lock(obj1);
		lock(obj2);
		...

then foo(obj, obj); is a deadlock but lockdep can warn about foo(obj,
different_obj) without triggering the deadlock in reality.  Of course
this leads to false positives, and we sometimes have to change correct
code to help lockdep, but usually such rewriting leads to simpler
clearer better locking anyway.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ