[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080805185438.GA8453@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:54:38 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: "Press, Jonathan" <Jonathan.Press@...com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
malware-list@...ts.printk.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a
linuxinterfaceforon access scanning
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 02:38:23PM -0400, Press, Jonathan wrote:
> Is your point that Linux and Unix machines are less vulnerable to
> viruses? If so, that's not relevant to my point at all. A Unix machine
> can be a carrier, passing infections on to other vulnerable platforms
> (guess which one). An enterprise security system sees the entire
> enterprise as an integrated whole -- not just individual machines with
> their own separate attributes and no impact on each other at all.
Sure, but if that's the case, you don't need to have a blocking open()
interface. Having inotify tell your application that a file
descriptor that had been opened for writing has been closed
(IN_CLOSE_WRITE) should be quite sufficient.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists