linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200808051656.28231.paul.moore@hp.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:56:28 -0400
From:	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc:	Cliffe <cliffe@...net>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	malware-list@...ts.printk.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning

On Monday 04 August 2008 11:44:28 pm Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Cliffe wrote:
> > Other security schemes such as intrusion detection,
> > firewalls/netfilter, anti-malware, and application restrictions
> > (sandboxes such as jails or finer grained restrictions such as
> > AppArmor) could all register LSMs onto the stack.
>
> Stacking is easy for files. It's a real pain in the backside for UDP
> packets.

How is it any better/worse for UDP packets than files?

-- 
paul moore
linux @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/