[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48996B0E.5000009@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:12:46 +0100
From: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@...rix.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: Spinlock recursion in hvc_poll
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. August 2008 schrieb Jeremy Fitzhardinge:
>> Alex Nixon wrote:
>>>>> Well I say fixed - it just means I can proceed to a spinlock recursion
>>>>> BUG() 2 secs into the boot process
>
> Ok, this is a guess, I dont fully understand the backtrace.
>
> request_irq tries to call the handler if the IRQ is shared. The irq handler
> calls hvc_poll and hvc_kill which might take the same spinlock.
> Can you test it this patch fixes the problem?
The patch appears to fix things.
- Alex
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/hvc_console.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
> @@ -322,10 +322,11 @@ static int hvc_open(struct tty_struct *t
>
> hp->tty = tty;
>
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
> +
> if (hp->ops->notifier_add)
> rc = hp->ops->notifier_add(hp, hp->data);
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
>
>
> /*
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists