linux-kernel - Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinterfaceforon access scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080806112646.GG6477@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi>
Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:26:46 +0300
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To:	tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	"Press, Jonathan" <Jonathan.Press@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	malware-list@...ts.printk.net
Subject: Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a
	linuxinterfaceforon access scanning

On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 12:07:57PM +0100, tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote on 06/08/2008 11:50:08:
> > 
> > As an observer of this thread:
> > 
> > - Some set of requirements suddenly appears out of the void on 
> >   linux-kernel.
> 
> Because previously it was said to go away and come back with a clear list 
> of requirements. And here you make it sound like a negative thing. See 
> what I am talking about?

Both of my points belong together.

> > - Noone is able and/or willing to exactly describe the problem(s) they 
> >   are trying to solve.
> 
> Hopefully we will get there. Very little time has passed since the 
> discussion has started, even less considering the time zone difference for 
> some.
> 
> > With this status quo the discussion is going nowhere - Linux kernel 
> > development does not work this way.
> > 
> > The aim is not to include this code, but to find the best technical 
> > solution for your problem(s) - no matter whether this will have anything
> > in common with the list of requirements and the code posted or not.
> 
> I completely agree with that. Here I was just pointing out that what Greg 
> wrote was untrue and exaggerated so not helping the discussion at all.

Until now the main discussion participant from the AV side is
Jonathan Press.

But the real discussion hasn't even started since the information 
required is not available.

And as soon as the information for the real discussion is available all 
these initial discussions become irrelevant.

> Tvrtko

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/