[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080806160618.40058068@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:06:18 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
jgarzik@...ox.com, Matt_Domsch@...l.com,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: Add support for Long Logical Sectors and Long
Physical Sectors
> > - FIFO managed for the odd command thats a funny size
>
> ... but it's not the odd command, it's going to be the vast majority of
> them.
Put a 512 byte and a 2K sector sized disk on the same channel and its
probably nearer 50/50.
>
> > - Various other levels of software managed controller
> > thumping
> >
> > It's not a passive thing and we'd want to do it post identify on the
> > drive pair as it'll often need per channel decisions (eg on FIFO)
>
> Why can't you just disable the (controller) FIFO whenever any drive
> reports != 512 byte sectors?
Because I'd like to do better than that - and FIFO is only one of the
cases. I think your proposal basically works - providing you identify
both drives before worrying about sector sizes. Most of our other logic
is done that way - the drives are all identified then the controller makes
decisions.
The setup time method then either vetos the disk or accepts it
The existing mode_filter can be used to implement stuff like "PIO only no
DMA" cases
And if we can do it but have problems the qc_issue or device select
methods can be hooked to do the work.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists