[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080806152402.GC13996@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 08:24:02 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Press, Jonathan" <Jonathan.Press@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
malware-list@...ts.printk.net
Subject: Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux
interfaceforon access scanning
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:24:21AM +0100, tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com wrote:
> Greg KH wrote on 05/08/2008 19:11:41:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 02:04:26PM -0400, Press, Jonathan wrote:
> > > I'm not sure if this is off the direct idea of this thread, or if I am
> > > possibly missing the whole point.
> >
> > I think you might be missing the point a bit here, as the traditional
> > Unix model that Linux has prevents much of what the "traditional AV"
> > products need to do, right?
>
> Could you please explain some more what and how do you think Unix model
> prevents?
It prevents any user from overwriting an existing executable, and it
prevents any user from adding an executable file to a common directory
(/usr/bin).
It also prevents any user from overwriting a different user's data file.
What specific threat model are you feeling is still present on Linux
today that this proposal is supposed to address?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists