linux-kernel - Re: What is the best way to identify a new x86 processor that does not implement the CPUID instruction?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:33:13 +0800
From:	"Jike Song" <albcamus@...il.com>
To:	"David Wilson" <mcs6502@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What is the best way to identify a new x86 processor that does not implement the CPUID instruction?

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:08 PM, David Wilson <mcs6502@...il.com> wrote:
> I have thought of a couple of schemes but am not really keen on either:
>
> 1) Clock speed - the SoC runs at 300+ MHz while the Cyrix part is < 100 MHz
at which speed this Soc is running when being recognized as Cyrix part by Linux?

> 2) Look at the PCI VID/PID for the north bridge as this is part of the CPU die.
>

As you said, since the manufacturer has provided some codes to tune
the CPU speed, did they provide any method to identify the CPU without
a cpuid function?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/