| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080806185719.GE24801@one.firstfloor.org> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:57:19 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, jmerkey@...fmountaingroup.com, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Merkey's Kernel Debugger > It depends how you look at the problem. I would agree that the use of Yes I left the possibility of a "someone writing a in kernel kgdb UI" out. Indeed that would be a possibility. On the other hand I'm not sure it would save all that much code versus just directly working on top of die notifiers. Also the gdb stub interface definitely has its limitations too. > > be quite possible to have a multitude of debuggers just using > > them. In fact that's already the cases, kprobes and kgdb and > > kdump are all kinds of debuggers using such hooks. > > > > I would agree that the possibility exists to use the hooks directly, It's not just a possibility, they are already used by multiple debugger like subsystems. e.g. kprobes is certainly a kind of debugger. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists