[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080806200721.GA30086@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:07:21 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
lf_kernel_messages@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ibm.com>,
Gerrit Huizenga <gh@...ibm.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Jochen Voß <jochen.voss@...glemail.com>,
Kunai Takashi <kunai@...ux-foundation.jp>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] kmsg: Kernel message catalog macros.
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:35:16AM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 15:31 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:10:04AM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 15:04 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:02:04AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 18:56, Martin Schwidefsky
> > > > > <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +#define kmsg_dev_alert(id, dev, format, arg...) \
> > > > > > + printk(__KMSG_CHECK(ALERT, id) KMSG_COMPONENT \
> > > > > > + ": %s: " format, (dev)->bus_id , ## arg)
> > > > >
> > > > > Care to use dev_name(), bus_id will be removed soon.
> > > >
> > > > Hm, just use dev_printk() instead, it handles all of these kinds of
> > > > changes automatically.
> > >
> > > Using dev_printk won't work because of the order of the elements of the
> > > printk. The kmsg tag should not have a "random" position in the printk
> > > but should be the first element. If we use dev_printk the kmsg tag will
> > > be the third element, for other kmsg printks it will be the first. In
> > > addition the kmsg message tag for the device drivers already includes
> > > the driver name ..
> >
> > But the structure of dev_printk() is well definied and should be pretty
> > trival to parse even with missing fields.
>
> The missing field is the message tag. Which is the key for the message
> lookup. As far as the kmsg catalog is concerned this is a pretty
> important field that may not be missing from the printk itself.
No, I mean use dev_printk() as the base for your logging macro. Add
your message tag as the first field after the dev_printk() information.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists