linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpuset.c : Removes extra variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:22:41 -0500
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	"Rakib Mullick" <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
Cc:	menage@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset.c : Removes extra variable

Rabik wrote:
> removes ... cpus_nonempty variable

No.

Sorry - I must NAQ this patch.  I intentionally add inessential
variables such as this in order to make the code easier to read.

I consider the line of code:

	if (cpus_nonempty && balance_flag_changed)

to be more readable than the line of clde:

	if (!cpus_empty(trialcs.cpus_allowed) && balance_flag_changed)

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/