| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080806202619.GN5605@tesla>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:26:19 -0700
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@...eros.com>,
"linville@...driver.com" <linville@...driver.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and
list_splice_tail_init()
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 02:03:15AM -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 15:48 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > If you are using linked lists for queues list_splice() will not do what
> > you would expect even if you use the elements passed reversed. We need
> > to handle these differently. We add list_splice_tail() and
> > list_splice_tail_init()
>
> In the -rt tree we have this:
>
> ---
> rt: list_splice2
>
> Introduce list_splice2{,_tail}() which will splice a sub-list denoted
> by two list items instead of the full list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
I like your version of list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
more as you re-use __list_splice() and fix it for its use instad of
adding a new __list_splice_tail(). You also caught some users of
__list_splice() for tail purposes. Its a good thing both versions
are functionally equivalent :) otherwise one of us was doing something
wrong.
We just need to also clarify list_splice() is for stacks and not
queues, I can add that. You patch however fails with checkpatch and
forgot to add kdoc. I'll correct it.
Last, list_splice2() should go in a separate patch and could use just a
little bit more documentation as exactly what it does. Also the last
hunk doesn't apply as 2.6.27 doesn't have lib/lock_list.c yet. To get ath9k
in 2.6.27 we need list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init(),
how's this for 2.6.27:
--
list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
If you are using linked lists for queues list_splice() will not do what
you would expect even if you use the elements passed reversed. We need
to handle these differently. We add list_splice_tail() and
list_splice_tail_init().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
---
drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c | 2 +-
drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 2 +-
include/linux/list.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c b/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c
index a52156e..bc8c6e3 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static dma_cookie_t ioat1_tx_submit(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
/* write address into NextDescriptor field of last desc in chain */
to_ioat_desc(ioat_chan->used_desc.prev)->hw->next =
first->async_tx.phys;
- __list_splice(&new_chain, ioat_chan->used_desc.prev);
+ list_splice_tail(&new_chain, &ioat_chan->used_desc);
ioat_chan->dmacount += desc_count;
ioat_chan->pending += desc_count;
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
index 2622b65..3712b92 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
@@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static struct ehci_qh *qh_append_tds (
list_del (&qtd->qtd_list);
list_add (&dummy->qtd_list, qtd_list);
- __list_splice (qtd_list, qh->qtd_list.prev);
+ list_splice_tail(qtd_list, &qh->qtd_list);
ehci_qtd_init(ehci, qtd, qtd->qtd_dma);
qh->dummy = qtd;
diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
index 453916b..61034a6 100644
--- a/include/linux/list.h
+++ b/include/linux/list.h
@@ -215,21 +215,21 @@ static inline int list_is_singular(const struct list_head *head)
}
static inline void __list_splice(const struct list_head *list,
- struct list_head *head)
+ struct list_head *prev,
+ struct list_head *next)
{
struct list_head *first = list->next;
struct list_head *last = list->prev;
- struct list_head *at = head->next;
- first->prev = head;
- head->next = first;
+ first->prev = prev;
+ prev->next = first;
- last->next = at;
- at->prev = last;
+ last->next = next;
+ next->prev = last;
}
/**
- * list_splice - join two lists
+ * list_splice - join two lists, this is designed for stacks
* @list: the new list to add.
* @head: the place to add it in the first list.
*/
@@ -237,7 +237,19 @@ static inline void list_splice(const struct list_head *list,
struct list_head *head)
{
if (!list_empty(list))
- __list_splice(list, head);
+ __list_splice(list, head, head->next);
+}
+
+/**
+ * list_splice_tail - join two lists, each list being a queue
+ * @list: the new list to add.
+ * @head: the place to add it in the first list.
+ */
+static inline void list_splice_tail(struct list_head *list,
+ struct list_head *head)
+{
+ if (!list_empty(list))
+ __list_splice(list, head->prev, head);
}
/**
@@ -251,7 +263,16 @@ static inline void list_splice_init(struct list_head *list,
struct list_head *head)
{
if (!list_empty(list)) {
- __list_splice(list, head);
+ __list_splice(list, head, head->next);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(list);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void list_splice_tail_init(struct list_head *list,
+ struct list_head *head)
+{
+ if (!list_empty(list)) {
+ __list_splice(list, head->prev, head);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(list);
}
}
--
1.5.6.rc2.15.g457bb.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists