linux-kernel - Weird behaviour on /proc/stat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <489A0B27.80604@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:35:51 -0300
From:	"Rafael C. de Almeida" <almeidaraf@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Weird behaviour on /proc/stat

I've executed the following code on a intel core 2 quad (linux 2.6.21.5):

for (( x=0; x < 1800; x = x+1 )); do
        head -n5 /proc/stat |
        awk '{ print $2+$3+$4+$5+$6+$7+$8+$9 }' |
        awk 'BEGIN { x=0 } { if (NR == 1) y=$0; else x=x+$1; } END {
print y, x }' |
        awk '{ print $0, $1-$2 }' >> values
        sleep 1;
done

My expectation was that the values file would have only 0s on the second
field. It didn't happen. Actually, it was always a value greater than 0.
So I went to the kernel code. The utilization is summed up here:

	http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.21.5/fs/proc/proc_misc.c#L463

Reading that file, if anything the sum of all the cpuX fields should be
greater than the cpu line. After all, it happens later and, if
information regarding the utilization is updated during the generation
of the output, then the cpuX lines should have a greater value.

I also noted that on
	http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.21.5/fs/proc/proc_misc.c#L463
for_each_possible_cpu is used. While on
	http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.21.5/fs/proc/proc_misc.c#L487
for_each_online_cpu is used. All the cores on the system are online, so
where could be the extra utilization that's being added to the first
line result?

I wish I had a machine with 4 cores which I could test changes on that
code, so I could investigate things a little further. But the only
machine I can change the kernel is my home computer which has only one
core  :(.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/