[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48991B83.5030607@overt.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:33:23 -0700
From: Philip Langdale <philipl@...rt.org>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
toshiba_acpi@...ebeam.org, Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] toshiba_acpi: Add support for bluetooth toggling
through rfkill (v2)
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> rfkill-input (now) or userspace (someday) will take care of kicking the
> radio to RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED when (1) issues an event that signals that
> radios don't have to remain blocked. Maybe this is why you see the WLAN
> going on when you deactivate the radio kill switch?
It's all done behind the scenes I think (it's an ipw2200 device). There's
no rfkill integration from that driver.
> And rfkill-input will soon be enhanced to let the user configure it to do
> something different if he wants. Your driver doesn't (and shouldn't)
> hardcode policy about it.
Ok, that makes things much easier for me :-) But it means that for now the
user will have to manually kick the device.
>
> Thanks. Please take note that rfkill will, right now, try to BLOCK all
> radios on suspend. That will be changed soon (2.6.28 at the latest), and
> your driver will have to handle blocking radios on suspend directly if it is
> needed for toshibas.
Why is this necessary? Doesn't the radio power down as part of the suspend
process? How would I tell what the hardware is doing?
I'll update the diff when I can.
--phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists