[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080807092241.GE372@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:22:42 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
nigel@...el.suspend2.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] kexec jump: in sync with hibernation implementation
> Add device_pm_lock() and device_pm_unlock() in kernel_kexec() to be
> in sync with current hibernation implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
>
> ---
> kernel/kexec.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/kernel/kexec.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec.c
> @@ -1457,6 +1457,7 @@ int kernel_kexec(void)
> error = disable_nonboot_cpus();
> if (error)
> goto Resume_devices;
> + device_pm_lock();
> local_irq_disable();
> /* At this point, device_suspend() has been called,
> * but *not* device_power_down(). We *must*
> @@ -1485,6 +1486,7 @@ int kernel_kexec(void)
> device_power_up(PMSG_RESTORE);
> Enable_irqs:
> local_irq_enable();
> + device_pm_unlock();
> enable_nonboot_cpus();
> Resume_devices:
> device_resume(PMSG_RESTORE);
>
Would it be possible to create common function for hibernation and
kexec? Keeping complex stuff like this in sync is ugly.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists