[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080807094754.GA32164@erda.amd.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:47:58 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@....ic.unicamp.br>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/24] x86: kernel/apm_32.c cleanup
On 28.07.08 18:09:09, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> Remove additional whitespaces and tabs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <gustavo@....ic.unicamp.br>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
> index 9ee24e6..b0c049c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
> @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static const char * const apm_event_name[] = {
>
> typedef struct lookup_t {
> int key;
> - char *msg;
> + char *msg;
Shouldn't this be a tab?
> } lookup_t;
>
> /*
> @@ -1679,8 +1679,8 @@ static int apm(void *unused)
> unsigned short cx;
> unsigned short dx;
> int error;
> - char *power_stat;
> - char *bat_stat;
> + char *power_stat;
> + char *bat_stat;
Why not using same indention as for error?
-Robert
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /* 2002/08/01 - WT
> --
> 1.5.4.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@....com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists