[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080807115748.7c57b952@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:57:48 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Dhaval Giani" <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Mike Travis" <travis@....com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] dyn_array and nr_irqs support v4
> #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
> #define valid_irq(irq) ((irq) > 0 && (irq) < nr_irqs)
> #else
> #define valid_irq(irq) ((irq) > 0)
For a sparse IRQ you might want to call an arch specific bit of C to do
the validating. Not sure that matters too much though as must user set
interrupts are ISA 8)
> anyway why 0 is invalid instead of -1U...?
So you can write the natural thing in C
if (!dev->irq)
poll_device();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists