| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1218119483.5837.112.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:31:23 -0400 From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com> To: Peter Dolding <oiaohm@...il.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, malware-list@...ts.printk.net, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinterfaceforon access scanning On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 00:21 +1000, Peter Dolding wrote: > Also TALPA is wrong because its a LSM. LSM are the most powerful > bits of the OS. LSM are the enforcers of Linux. They are the last > line of defence for the OS. You have your normal permission systems > when they fail then its the job of a LSM to pick up the mess. I've been trying to ignore you, but I just can't any more. Please dear god look at my work before spewing this crap. My work is not an LSM. My work doesn't care about bind mounts, it cares about inodes. My work is not path name based. I'm not sure who you are trying to convince of something here but obviously talking about something you don't know about is not working for you..... -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists