linux-kernel - Re: Btrfs v0.16 released

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <489B0DB1.30407@nortel.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:58:57 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Btrfs v0.16 released

Chris Mason wrote:

> I haven't done any real single cpu testing, it may make sense in those
> workloads to checksum and submit directly in the calling context.  But
> real single cpu boxes are harder to come by these days.

They're still pretty common in the embedded/low power space.  I could 
see something like a settop box wanting to use btrfs with massive disks.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/