[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200808070903.23787.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:03:22 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
greg@...ah.com
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: add misrouted interrupt error handling
On Tuesday, August 5, 2008 2:54 pm James Bottomley wrote:
> > or somesuch. That seems just as simple for driver writers as your
> > initial patch, and the function is named in accordance with what it
> > actually does, rather than what it's used for...
>
> It could, but if the bridge is the culprit (as it usually is for MSI
> problems), this print won't help identify it.
>
> Therefore, rather than give driver writers a recipe for "print this and
> this and go to the bridge and print this", I'd rather have a single PCI
> callback that prints all the (hopefully) relevant information that will
> allow either fixing or blacklisting.
So in addition to the IRQ type check we need to dump some device topology
information... yeah that makes sense. I wonder if the driver core should
provide something like this. Greg? In the meantime we can definitely add
the IRQ type function.
Thanks,
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists