[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080807230652.20f231e4@hyperion.delvare>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 23:06:52 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: "Michael Krufky" <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>
Cc: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@...nborg.org>,
"D. Kelly" <user.kernel@...il.com>,
"mailing list: linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux I2C" <i2c@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with restricted I2C algorithms in kernel 2.6.26!
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:03:36 -0400, Michael Krufky wrote:
> I agree with Trent and D.Kelly
>
> These options should be made available to the user -- We should go
> with the patch that Jean posted, "Subject: i2c: Let users select
> algorithm drivers manually again" -- this is a fair compromise for
> both sides -- users that dont know should leave the automatic
> selection enabled. Users that know better can disable the automatic
> selection and enable what they need.
>
> The statement, "just have the external driver merged into the kernel"
> is not a solution.
Why not, please? A vast majority of drivers work fine that way today. I
am still waiting for someone to give me a good reason why some other
drivers supposedly can't be merged upstream (something better than
"believe me, it's impossible".)
> Removing the option to build those additional algos is a regression, IMHO
Will be addressed soon, do not worry.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists