[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0808070951550.15561@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:04:27 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: David Wagner <daw@...berkeley.edu>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for
on access scanning
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, David Wagner wrote:
> As I recall, the basic stats looked like this: about 30% of zero-day
> malware samples
> were detected on the first day they were released (and 70% weren't).
> The median number of days until a new malware sample was detected was
> about 40 days. If you wanted hundreds of days, asymptotically McAfee was
> able to detect about 70% of the samples (and 30% were never detected).
> I expect the situation to get worse in the future, not better.
This is similar to the stats published by AusCert a couple of years back
where they claimed that AV software failed to detect 80% of new malware:
<http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/security/soa/Eighty-percent-of-new-malware-defeats-antivirus/0,130061744,139263949,00.htm>
Interestingly, AusCert still describe up-to-date anti-virus software as
being "essential", per http://www.auscert.org.au/render.html?it=6891
In any case, the above relates to Windows desktops -- we are yet to see
a rationale for adding AV support to the Linux kernel.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists