[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <489B6A5C.8030400@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:34:20 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
CC: Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix broken VMI in 2.6.27-rc..
Zachary Amsden wrote:
>
> That can't be done until we know the size of the hole to relocate, which
> isn't known until we probe in the first meg of memory to find the
> associated ROM. It used to be the case that other things that poked
> around with platform specific memory and checking ROM areas lived around
> here in setup.c, so it was a nice place to put it. With all the
> abstraction and combination and overifdeffing going on here, that might
> no longer be the case.
>
> We could move it earlier, but then we'd need another hook to call in
> after max_low_pfn is known.
>
> Or we could remove the dependency on max_low_pfn and just create a
> liberal linear to physical mapping for lomem which spans all possible
> low memory; then it doesn't matter so much where it is called.
>
Okay, you lost me about halfway through that... could you perhaps
describe the problem from the beginning, exactly what you're trying to do?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists