[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <489B836A.3050209@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:21:14 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix broken VMI in 2.6.27-rc..
Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Or we could remove the dependency on max_low_pfn and just create a
> liberal linear to physical mapping for lomem which spans all possible
> low memory; then it doesn't matter so much where it is called.
>
Yes. You could just call reserve_top_address() at a suitably early
point to reserve the space. Its a pvops API call which has been there
since patch one or two of pvops.
It does exactly what the rest of this thread discusses, rendering it moot.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists