[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:31:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ftrace: to kill a daemon
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 21:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > Which would people prefer? I little longer full build and do the
> > modification on every object, or have a shorter full build, but every
> > build will take that extra minute to do?
>
> I have a very strong preference to do it per obj rather than at the end,
> that way it can be distributed and make these fancy smp boxen useful.
>
> Bonus points if you can make distcc dig it.
Yes, the CC used in the script does indeed use distcc (if you are using
it).
;-)
-- Steve
>
> The vmlinux link path is the thing that is killing build performance,
> anything to shorten that is golden, anything increasing it needs _very_
> good justification.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists