[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:26:42 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...i.umich.edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: neilb@...e.de, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [2.6 patch] uninline nfsd4_op_name()
There doesn't seem to be a compelling reason why nfsd4_op_name() is
marked as "inline":
It's only used in a dprintk(), and as long as it has only one caller
non-ancient gcc versions anyway inline it automatically.
This patch fixes the following compile error with gcc 3.4:
<-- snip -->
...
CC fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.o
nfs4proc.c: In function `nfsd4_proc_compound':
nfs4proc.c:854: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to
nfs4proc.c:897: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
make[3]: *** [fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.o] Error 1
<-- snip -->
Reported-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
---
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ struct nfsd4_operation {
static struct nfsd4_operation nfsd4_ops[];
-static inline char *nfsd4_op_name(unsigned opnum);
+static char *nfsd4_op_name(unsigned opnum);
/*
* COMPOUND call.
@@ -1116,8 +1116,7 @@ static struct nfsd4_operation nfsd4_ops[OP_RELEASE_LOCKOWNER+1] = {
},
};
-static inline char *
-nfsd4_op_name(unsigned opnum)
+static char *nfsd4_op_name(unsigned opnum)
{
if (opnum < ARRAY_SIZE(nfsd4_ops))
return nfsd4_ops[opnum].op_name;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists