[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de, marcin.slusarz@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq->lock and xtime lock
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Something along the lines of the below patch?
Could we not literally just make this a RCU event? Unconditionally too?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists