linux-kernel - Re: worth separating serial from parallel ATA kernel options?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:53:57 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: worth separating serial from parallel ATA kernel options?

On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Alan Cox wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:32:23 -0400 (EDT)
> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca> wrote:
>
> >
> >   asked from a position of appalling ignorance, but would it be more
> > organized to be able to select serial ATA functionality separately
> > from parallel ATA?
>
> The correct fix is to remove the (experimental) from the Parallel
> ATA drivers Kconfig
>
> For the rest of the menu the list is SATA first, then PATA (and PATA
> is roughly alphabetic but both want a tidy)

  that definitely sounds like a job for the real ATA people.  i'll
leave it to them.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/