linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] introduce sys_checkpoint and sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:33:17 -0400
From:	Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] introduce sys_checkpoint and sys_restore



Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 08 August 2008, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>  linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S |    2 ++
>>  linux-2.6.git-dave/include/asm-x86/unistd_32.h        |    2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> System calls should also be declared in include/linux/syscalls.h.
> 
> I guess you are aware that this implementation is not enough to
> support 32 bit tasks on x86_64. In addition to the native 64-bit
> code, you would also need the 32-bit compat code here.

Yes, of course. The current code does not attempt to do that yet.

Oren.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/