lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:33:17 -0400 From: Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> CC: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] introduce sys_checkpoint and sys_restore Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 08 August 2008, Dave Hansen wrote: >> linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S | 2 ++ >> linux-2.6.git-dave/include/asm-x86/unistd_32.h | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) > > System calls should also be declared in include/linux/syscalls.h. > > I guess you are aware that this implementation is not enough to > support 32 bit tasks on x86_64. In addition to the native 64-bit > code, you would also need the 32-bit compat code here. Yes, of course. The current code does not attempt to do that yet. Oren. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists