lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 03:55:56 +0530 From: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in> To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> Cc: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: handle chains involving classes defined in modules On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:24:37AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: > On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 02:27 +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote: > > /proc/lockdep_chains currently oopses after any module which creates and > > uses a lock is unloaded. This is because one of the chains involves a > > class which was defined in the module just unloaded. > > > > The classes are already correctly taken care of using the > > all_lock_classes which keeps track of all active lock classses. Add a > > similar all_lock_chains list and use it for keeping track of chains. > > [...] > > I think there is a simpler method to deal with this. Yes. I went with the all_lock_chains list approach because there was similar code already being used to keep track of lock_class structures. > - Mark class as useless during zap_class() > - When output lock_chain, if some classes are useless, do not output the > class. Like the patch below? I set ->key to NULL after zapping the class and use that as a condition to not print the class' information. The only issue is that with this patch there will be some chains output with no locks listed under them. --- lockdep: handle chains involving classes defined in modules /proc/lockdep_chains currently oopses after any module which creates and uses a lock is unloaded. This is because one of the chains involves a class which was defined in the module just unloaded. Solve this by marking the classes as unused and not printing information about the unused classes. Reported-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@....de> Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in> diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c index d38a643..8ade874 100644 --- a/kernel/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/lockdep.c @@ -2988,6 +2988,7 @@ static void zap_class(struct lock_class *class) list_del_rcu(&class->hash_entry); list_del_rcu(&class->lock_entry); + class->key = NULL; } static inline int within(const void *addr, void *start, unsigned long size) diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c index 9b0e940..f09b6c7 100644 --- a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c +++ b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ static int lc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) for (i = 0; i < chain->depth; i++) { class = lock_chain_get_class(chain, i); + if (!class->key) + continue; + seq_printf(m, "[%p] ", class->key); print_name(m, class); seq_puts(m, "\n"); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists