[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1KRmxa-0001S5-E0@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:50:14 +0200
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ftrace: to kill a daemon
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
>> > I'm stubborn, I want to get it right _and_ keep it fast.
>>
>> For me it would seem better to just not use two part 5 byte nops
>> instead of adding such hacks. I doubt there are that many of them
>> anyways. I bet you won't be able to measure any difference between the
>> different nop types in any macro benchmark.
>
> I wish we had a true 5 byte nop. The alternative is a jmp 0, which is
> measurable.
Did you try short jumps? (0xeb 0x03 0x?? 0x?? 0x??)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists