[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080809143727.GA30499@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 22:37:27 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...m.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"vegard.nossum@...il.com" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:11:21PM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> With out the recent dynamic fpu allocation changes, while we don't see oops,
> there is a possible race still present in older kernels(for example,
> while kernel is using kernel_fpu_begin() in some optimized clear/copy
> page and an interrupt/softirq happens which uses these padlock
> instructions generating DNA fault).
No this wasn't a problem because kernel_fpu_begin clears TS and
therefore we don't get faults on SSE instructions.
However, with your patch it will become a problem due to the
fact that it wasn't designed to be nested.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists