[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1218295039.2994.49.camel@raven.themaw.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:17:18 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
autofs mailing list <autofs@...ux.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] autofs4 - cleanup autofs mount type usage
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 08:47 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:40:06PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > Usage of the AUTOFS_TYPE_* defines is a little confusing and
> > appears inconsistent.
>
> Not enough of an explanation for this patch.
OK, I'll re-submit this with an updated description.
>
> It does:
>
> - move AUTOFS_TYPE_INDIRECT/AUTOFS_TYPE_DIRECT/AUTOFS_TYPE_OFFSET
> to include/linux/auto_fs4.h. Obviously okay but should mentioned
> in the changelog.
So that user space can use consistent definitions.
> - add a new, unused AUTOFS_TYPE_ANY constant. Why?
It is used by the later ioctl implementation patch.
> - add a new AUTOFS_TYPE_TRIGGER and use it instead of
> AUTOFS_TYPE_DIRECT or in one single case
> (AUTOFS_TYPE_DIRECT|AUTOFS_TYPE_OFFSET). Definitively needs a good
> explanation.
The direct and offset autofs mount types are, to a large extent, treated
the same way in the kernel module but are used a little differently in
user space. Previously, an offset mount had it's type set to
AUTOFS_TYPE_DIRECT|AUTOFS_TYPE_OFFSET but, the subsequent ioctl
implementation patch needs to be able to identify all three types of
autofs mount distinctly.
> - replaces one use of sbi->type = 0 with AUTOFS_TYPE_INDIRECT (0x0001).
> Why?
Previously, a type of 0 was implicitly assumed to be type
AUTOFS_TYPE_INDIRECT but that was not clear and doesn't lend itself to
clearly defined logic when trying to locate a specific type of autofs
mount in the later patch in the series.
Ian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists