[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080809042401.0A7B4B8AE@nebuchadnezzar.smejdil.cz>
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 06:24:00 +0200
From: "CIJOML" <cijoml@...ny.cz>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: PATCH: enable PAT at Pentium M 1.7 GHz
H. Peter Anvin writes:
> CIJOML wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> Sending oneliner enabling PAT at my Pentium M 1.7 GHz CPU. It simply
>> works.
>
> That's not really the right way to do that. Unfortunately the likely
> failure scenario is "data corruption after a month of uptime." Thus, we
> really need someone to review the relevant errata; I believe Venki is
> planning to do so.
>
> -hpa
Well the truth is, that I use this little tweak from 2.6.26-rc and first cpu
having PAT was P3 XEON. And because Intel has backward compatibility, it is
safe to use it.
I don't have any problem with loosing data or any suspend/resume problems
with this.
Reference:
http://safari.ibmpressbooks.com/032124656X/ch32
Best regards
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists