linux-kernel - Re: PATCH: enable PAT at Pentium M 1.7 GHz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 09 Aug 2008 06:24:00 +0200
From:	"CIJOML" <cijoml@...ny.cz>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: PATCH: enable PAT at Pentium M 1.7 GHz

H. Peter Anvin writes: 

> CIJOML wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> Sending oneliner enabling PAT at my Pentium M 1.7 GHz CPU. It simply 
>> works.
> 
> That's not really the right way to do that.  Unfortunately the likely 
> failure scenario is "data corruption after a month of uptime."  Thus, we 
> really need someone to review the relevant errata; I believe Venki is 
> planning to do so. 
> 
> 	-hpa

Well the truth is, that I use this little tweak from 2.6.26-rc and first cpu 
having PAT was P3 XEON. And because Intel has backward compatibility, it is 
safe to use it.
I don't have any problem with loosing data or any suspend/resume problems 
with this. 

Reference:
http://safari.ibmpressbooks.com/032124656X/ch32 

Best regards 

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/