[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080809070344.GA11302@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 09:03:44 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
linux arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kbuild now support arch/$ARCH/include - time for ARCHs to convert
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 12:09:28PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 04:52:44AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:23:15PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > > I just did the necessary changes for MIPS and the first testbuild is running
> > > successfully so far.
> > >
> > > One of the ugly things in the MIPS makefiles is the use of platform-
> > > specific headers in include/asm-mips/mach-* which contain platform specific
> > > headers. Ideally those should be included through something like
> > > <mach/somefile.h> or <plat/something.h> and I think a directory like
> > > arch/$ARCH/$PLATFORM/include/plat/foobar.h could be a good place in the
> > > new scheme? I assume other platforms have similar issues with subplatforms,
> > > processor sub-architectures etc.?
> >
> > Hi Ralf.
> >
> > Did you follow what arm have planned?
> > It looks like MIPS should do things in the same way so
> > we get some consistency.
> >
> Where was this discussed? SH has the same issues obviously, but we've
> already settled on a scheme.
Looking again I realize this was only discussed on the arm kernel mailing list
and people involved was rmk, Harvaard and myself.
This was not optimal - sorry.
How much mips and arm solution differ I have not looked at closely.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists