[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440808090030k7269590ftf233a13a21a2e37e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 00:30:06 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Dhaval Giani" <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Mike Travis" <travis@....com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/42] introduce nr_irqs
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 6:59 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> and at this point it is equal NR_IRQS
>>>
>>> This patch is ok, but this approach is fundamentally broken.
>>> Only 19 architectures use GENERIC_HARDIRQS
>>>
>>> The only required interface is interrupt.h not irq.h
>>>
>>> So you may not replace NR_IRQS with nr_irqs in anything other
>>> then genirq code and some architecture code.
>>>
>>> Doing so will break the build on several architectures.
>>
>> some platforms will not use include/linux/irq.h and kernel/irq/handle.c ?
>>
>
> Also, what's the point, if it's just a renaming?
that is the start point.
nr_irqs is variable, and will be probed later. and use that number to
init dyn_alloc.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists