linux-kernel - Re: Query: should 'Marvell SATA support' depend on PCI?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200808101426.39778.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:26:39 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Query: should 'Marvell SATA support' depend on PCI?

On Sunday, 10 of August 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > doesn't have 'depends on PCI && EXPERIMENTAL' like other drivers around 
> > > it, this is okay or should it also depend on PCI?
> > 
> > Well, I think so.  It obviously depends on PCI.
> 
> Obviously ? Try looking a bit harder
> 
> /**
>  *      mv_platform_probe - handle a positive probe of an soc Marvell
>  *      host
>  *      @pdev: platform device found
>  *
>  *      LOCKING:
>  *      Inherited from caller.
>  */
> static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

Sorry, I didn't notice the '#ifdef CONFIG_PCI' in there.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/