linux-kernel - Re: cpufreq doesn't seem to work in Intel Q9300

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:22:44 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	"S K" <nospamnoham@...il.com>
Cc:	"Zhao Yakui" <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
	"Thomas Renninger" <trenn@...e.de>,
	"Alan Jenkins" <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpufreq doesn't seem to work in Intel Q9300

On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:44:50 -0700
"S K" <nospamnoham@...il.com> wrote:


> >
> > But it is very strange that cpufreq scaling can work on Windows XP.
> > Will you please try the P4 clock cpufreq driver and see whether the
> > scaling can work ? In fact P4 clock cpufreq driver is already
> > replaced by acpi_cpufreq driver for the latest cpu.
> > Anyway please try p4 clock cpufreq driver.
> 
> What is the name of the driver? I'm not able to find any such driver
> in Fedora 9 installed modules. There is only acpi-cpufreq and
> powernow-k8.
> 

yeah don't bother with p4-clockmod, it's not something that saves you
energy... it only gives you a fake feeling that you would.

-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/