[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080811131400.GA909@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:14:00 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [revert] mysql+oltp regression
* Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com> wrote:
>>> Speaking of this: Another patch I submitted to you Ingo (had to do
>>> with updating the load_weight inside task_setprio) seems to also
>>> have this phenomenon: e.g. its technically correct but further
>>> testing has revealed negative repercussions elsewhere. So please
>>> ignore that patch (or revert if you already pulled in, but I don't
>>> think you have). Ill try to look into this issue as well.
>>
>> ok, under which thread/subject is that? Not queued in tip/sched/*
>> yet, correct?
>>
> Here is the original thread:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/3/416
>
> I do not believe you have queued it anywhere (public anyway) yet.
>
> Note I have already invalidated 1/2, and now I am retracting 2/2 as
> well. (1/2 is actually a bogus patch, 2/2 is "technically correct"
> but causes ripples in the load balancer that need to be sorted out
> first.
ok, thanks. I'm curious, what are those ripple effects? Stability or
performance?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists