[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080811140206.GB3338@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:02:06 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: S K <nospamnoham@...il.com>, Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpufreq doesn't seem to work in Intel Q9300
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:22:44AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:44:50 -0700
> "S K" <nospamnoham@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > > But it is very strange that cpufreq scaling can work on Windows XP.
> > > Will you please try the P4 clock cpufreq driver and see whether the
> > > scaling can work ? In fact P4 clock cpufreq driver is already
> > > replaced by acpi_cpufreq driver for the latest cpu.
> > > Anyway please try p4 clock cpufreq driver.
> >
> > What is the name of the driver? I'm not able to find any such driver
> > in Fedora 9 installed modules. There is only acpi-cpufreq and
> > powernow-k8.
>
> yeah don't bother with p4-clockmod, it's not something that saves you
> energy... it only gives you a fake feeling that you would.
This statement is only true for HPC environments and when you measure
Watts per work done.
But if you have some desktop or server with a load that is determined by
when it gets used, then p4-clockmod can actually save energy when the
computer is not under high load or even idle.
Or do I miss anything?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists