[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200808111725.13635.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:25:13 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] checkpoint-restart: general infrastructure
On Monday 11 August 2008, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> One reason is that I suspect that stops us from being able to send that
> data straight to a pipe to compress and/or send on the network, without
> hitting local disk. Though if the checkpointfs was ram-based maybe not?
>
> As Oren has pointed out before, passing in an fd means we can pass a
> socket into the syscall.
>
> Using the anon_inodes would also prevent that, but if it makes for a
> cleaner overall solution then I'm not against considering either one
> of course.
>
With anon_inodes, you can still implement splice_read/splice_write,
so you can splice it into a socket.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists