[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080811170219.GJ4524@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:02:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...e.de, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: remove empty lines from stack traces/oopses
* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
> unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp, char *log_lvl)
> {
> - printk("\nCall Trace:\n");
> + printk("Call Trace:\n");
> dump_trace(task, regs, stack, bp, &print_trace_ops, log_lvl);
> - printk("\n");
> }
hm, it's nice to have stack traces stand out a bit, and to not get the
'Call Trace' embedded in the middle of a printk (which happens to crash
or produce a stack dump).
> void show_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
> @@ -386,6 +385,7 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
> printk(" %016lx", *stack++);
> touch_nmi_watchdog();
> }
> + printk("\n");
> show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, bp, log_lvl);
> }
>
> @@ -443,7 +443,6 @@ void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs)
> printk("Stack: ");
> show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, (unsigned long *)sp,
> regs->bp, "");
> - printk("\n");
>
> printk(KERN_EMERG "Code: ");
just to make sure i get the gist of your change, do you have a 'before'
and 'after' sample oops, so that we can see the difference?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists